Espiritualidade em cuidados paliativos: estados da família após a perda do seu ente querido
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In the last quarter the research concerning spirituality in general is growing as also its place in an individual level and in palliative care. The holistic look of palliative to the individual, regarding him in their several dimensions, physical, psychological, social, and spiritual, makes palliative care a different approach. Therefore, the research “Spirituality in Palliative Care: spiritual stages of the family after the loss of a loved one”, arises from a Social Work need to develop a reflexive practice concerning its intervention and search for more and better answers in its action field, particularly in palliative care. The aims are to characterize the spiritual stages of the carer after the death of their beloved one and seek their needs during the grief. This reflexive study presents a bibliographic review and text analysis. In the empirical study was chosen a qualitative methodology founded in interviews, contents analysis and phenomenological analysis. The tools used to identify the spiritual stages of family were a scale of spiritual needs and a semi structure interview.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.007 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it