A discontinuous cantilever beam analogy for quantifying higher mode demands in stacked rocking cores
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Summary Stacked rocking core (SRC) combinations are innovative sustainable structural assemblies that mitigate seismic demands through uplift at the hinge joints and direct damage to replaceable fuses. The stacked segments curtail substantially higher mode effects by the relative motions between multilevel cores. Currently, few research studies have quantified the behavior of SRCs under earthquake shaking. This paper presents a novel closed‐form solution for quantifying the higher mode demands of stacked braced frames subjected to seismic excitation. The mathematical formulae for modal analysis are derived using the analogy of discontinuous cantilever beam and Euler–Bernoulli equation. The proposed equations provide a method for rapid analysis and preliminary design of low‐ to mid‐rise SRCs. A parametric study is carried out to investigate the influences of rotational restraint of segments and the location of the rocking joints. Results verified by time response analysis indicate the validity and accuracy of the suggested formulae.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it