MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3198126337 · doi:10.7759/cureus.17798

Ventilation With or Without Endotracheal Tube Leak in Prolonged Neonatal Asphyxia

2021· article· en· W3198126337 on OpenAlexaff
Alexandros Douvanas, Maria Kalafati, Eleni Tamvaki, Alexandra Nieri, Αpostolos Papalois, Christina Koulouglioti, Afrodite Aggelina, Elizabeth Papathanassoglou

Bibliographic record

VenueCureus · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineAsphyxiaAnesthesiaLeakNeonatal resuscitationPeak inspiratory pressureVentilation (architecture)Mechanical ventilationResuscitationRespiratory systemTidal volumeInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

(p=0.032) between Group B (126.4±53.4 mmHg) compared to Group A (72.28±29.18 mmHg) and Group C (94.28±20.46 mmHg) as well as in the right atrial pressure (p<0.001) between Group C (4.5 mmHg) vs Groups A (2 mmHg) and B (2 mmHg) during ROSC time. Lactate levels were statistically significantly lower (p=0.035) in Group C (mean=0.92 ± 0.07mmol/L) as compared to Group A (mean=1.13 ± 0.1 mmol/L) and Group B (mean= 1.08 ± 0.07 mmol /L; p = 0.034) at 4h post-ROSC. Conclusion We provide preliminary evidence that ventilation with ETT with moderate leakage improves survival after 2h of ROSC, along with oxygenation and hemodynamic parameters, in a porcine model of neonatal asphyxia and resuscitation, compared to less leakage ETT.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.290
Teacher spread0.272 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCureus→Same topicCardiac Arrest and Resuscitation→French-language works237,207→