MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3198153438 · doi:10.1016/j.xjtc.2021.09.013

Commentary: Try it, you may like it

2021· editorial· en· W3198153438 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Soichiro Kitamura

Bibliographic record

VenueJTCVS Techniques · 2021
Typeeditorial
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicKawasaki Disease and Coronary Complications
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersBC Children's Hospital
KeywordsMedicineAnastomosisArteryPerioperativeBypass graftingCardiothoracic surgeryInternal thoracic arteryCardiologyInternal medicineCoronary artery bypass surgerySurgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The paper that appeared in the recent issue of the Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery Techniques1 reported 4 infants of 3 to 4 months' age who underwent pediatric coronary bypass surgery (PCABS) with an internal thoracic artery (ITA) graft and a surgical microscope. Three of the 4 patients previously had an arterial switch operation (ASO) for transposition of the great arteries. PCABS was performed to restore coronary hypoperfusion due to a failure of coronary transfer, which often leads to perioperative mortality.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.043
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Editorial · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.059
Threshold uncertainty score0.197

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.043
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0040.003
Scholarly communication0.0040.006
Open science0.0040.002
Research integrity0.0360.036
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0590.027

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.334
Teacher spread0.318 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEditorial

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJTCVS TechniquesSame topicKawasaki Disease and Coronary ComplicationsFrench-language works237,207