Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Central MessagePediatric coronary artery bypass surgery using an internal thoracic artery has now been established for infants and children of any age. A surgical microscope facilitates secure anastomosis.See Article page 441. Pediatric coronary artery bypass surgery using an internal thoracic artery has now been established for infants and children of any age. A surgical microscope facilitates secure anastomosis. See Article page 441. The paper that appeared in the recent issue of the Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery Techniques1Iwata Y. Takeuchi T. Konuma T. Obase K. Eishi K. Infant coronary artery bypass grafting completely under surgical microscope.J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Tech. 2021; 10: 441-443Scopus (2) Google Scholar reported 4 infants of 3 to 4 months' age who underwent pediatric coronary bypass surgery (PCABS) with an internal thoracic artery (ITA) graft and a surgical microscope. Three of the 4 patients previously had an arterial switch operation (ASO) for transposition of the great arteries. PCABS was performed to restore coronary hypoperfusion due to a failure of coronary transfer, which often leads to perioperative mortality.2Kitamura S. Pediatric coronary artery bypass surgery for congenital heart disease.Ann Thorac Surg. 2018; 106: 1570-1577Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (22) Google Scholar,3Mavroudis C. Coronary artery bypass grafting in infants, children and young adults for acquired and congenital lesions.Cong Heart Dis. 2017; 12: 644-646Crossref PubMed Scopus (5) Google Scholar In their report, the use of a microscope facilitated PCABS for neonates and infants as a reliable mode of surgical treatment, even in emergency situations. In this scenario, most pediatric cardiac surgeons prefer surgical ostial angioplasty with a patch of various materials rather than PCABS with an ITA, most probably because they are simply not familiar with PCABS. Repair of the transferred coronary orifice by angioplastic procedures requires a total dissection of the suture line for ASO under long aortic crossclamping. PCABS with an ITA graft does not require dissection of previous suture lines at all, which offers much faster and simpler alternatives. Aortic crossclamping is only needed for anastomotic procedures. Retrograde coronary flow by a bypass or saving an ITA for future use is of little concern. The long-term patency and growth potential of the ITA graft in infants and small children who had previously undergone ASO and coronary events are excellent, as shown in Figure 1. They are now free of symptoms, conducting a normal life as a businessman and a student, respectively. Each of the right and left ITAs can provide sufficient blood flow for each of the right and left coronary arteries, and bilateral ITAs can supply entire coronary blood flow to the heart with bilateral coronary obstructions.4Kitamura S. A new arena in cardiac surgery. Pediatric coronary artery bypass surgery.Proc Jpn Acad Ser B Phys Biol Sci. 2018; 94: 1-19Crossref PubMed Scopus (11) Google Scholar Because of the friability and small size of the coronary artery and the ITA in infants, a microsurgical technique is essential.3Mavroudis C. Coronary artery bypass grafting in infants, children and young adults for acquired and congenital lesions.Cong Heart Dis. 2017; 12: 644-646Crossref PubMed Scopus (5) Google Scholar,4Kitamura S. A new arena in cardiac surgery. Pediatric coronary artery bypass surgery.Proc Jpn Acad Ser B Phys Biol Sci. 2018; 94: 1-19Crossref PubMed Scopus (11) Google Scholar The use of a surgical microscope facilitates fine anastomosis. Iwata and colleagues are to be commended for demonstrating excellent results with this technique. I myself used a surgical microscope in 1994 for PCABS.4Kitamura S. A new arena in cardiac surgery. Pediatric coronary artery bypass surgery.Proc Jpn Acad Ser B Phys Biol Sci. 2018; 94: 1-19Crossref PubMed Scopus (11) Google Scholar Surgical microscopes have advanced considerably since then. Dr Eishi's group used ×20 magnification and 9-0 or 10-0 sutures, which were reasonable under ×10 to 20 magnification. Continuing practice may be necessary to maintain expert hands, although infant coronary bypass is fortunately rare. Nowadays, brain surgeons, ophthalmologists, ear–nose–throat surgeons, orthopedic surgeons, and plastic surgeons all use microscopes, and lymphatic vessel anastomosis has become possible. Why is this not the case for young pediatric cardiac surgeons? Try it, you may like it. I hope this publication contributes to changing pediatric cardiac surgeons’ minds and viewpoints. The author is grateful to Dr Hiroaki Kawata, Department of Cardiac Surgery, Osaka Women's and Children's Hospital, Osaka, Japan, for allowing him to use the coronary angiogram of the right panel of the Figure 1. Infant coronary artery bypass grafting completely under surgical microscopeJTCVS TechniquesVol. 10PreviewWith an increase in congenital heart surgeries such as arterial switch operation (ASO) or the Ross procedure, coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) in infants has become an increasingly important option because of coronary obstruction as a result of coronary manipulation.1,2 CABG in infants includes technical challenges associated with operating on small vessels. A microscope is, therefore, a promising tool to assist CABG in infants in achieving successful coronary revascularization.3,4 This case series introduces 4 infants who underwent total microscopic CABG. Full-Text PDF Open Access
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it