Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Central MessagePediatric coronary artery bypass surgery using an internal thoracic artery has now been established for infants and children of any age. A surgical microscope facilitates secure anastomosis.See Article page 441. Pediatric coronary artery bypass surgery using an internal thoracic artery has now been established for infants and children of any age. A surgical microscope facilitates secure anastomosis. See Article page 441. The paper that appeared in the recent issue of the Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery Techniques1Iwata Y. Takeuchi T. Konuma T. Obase K. Eishi K. Infant coronary artery bypass grafting completely under surgical microscope.J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Tech. 2021; 10: 441-443Scopus (2) Google Scholar reported 4 infants of 3 to 4 months' age who underwent pediatric coronary bypass surgery (PCABS) with an internal thoracic artery (ITA) graft and a surgical microscope. Three of the 4 patients previously had an arterial switch operation (ASO) for transposition of the great arteries. PCABS was performed to restore coronary hypoperfusion due to a failure of coronary transfer, which often leads to perioperative mortality.2Kitamura S. Pediatric coronary artery bypass surgery for congenital heart disease.Ann Thorac Surg. 2018; 106: 1570-1577Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (22) Google Scholar,3Mavroudis C. Coronary artery bypass grafting in infants, children and young adults for acquired and congenital lesions.Cong Heart Dis. 2017; 12: 644-646Crossref PubMed Scopus (5) Google Scholar In their report, the use of a microscope facilitated PCABS for neonates and infants as a reliable mode of surgical treatment, even in emergency situations. In this scenario, most pediatric cardiac surgeons prefer surgical ostial angioplasty with a patch of various materials rather than PCABS with an ITA, most probably because they are simply not familiar with PCABS. Repair of the transferred coronary orifice by angioplastic procedures requires a total dissection of the suture line for ASO under long aortic crossclamping. PCABS with an ITA graft does not require dissection of previous suture lines at all, which offers much faster and simpler alternatives. Aortic crossclamping is only needed for anastomotic procedures. Retrograde coronary flow by a bypass or saving an ITA for future use is of little concern. The long-term patency and growth potential of the ITA graft in infants and small children who had previously undergone ASO and coronary events are excellent, as shown in Figure 1. They are now free of symptoms, conducting a normal life as a businessman and a student, respectively. Each of the right and left ITAs can provide sufficient blood flow for each of the right and left coronary arteries, and bilateral ITAs can supply entire coronary blood flow to the heart with bilateral coronary obstructions.4Kitamura S. A new arena in cardiac surgery. Pediatric coronary artery bypass surgery.Proc Jpn Acad Ser B Phys Biol Sci. 2018; 94: 1-19Crossref PubMed Scopus (11) Google Scholar Because of the friability and small size of the coronary artery and the ITA in infants, a microsurgical technique is essential.3Mavroudis C. Coronary artery bypass grafting in infants, children and young adults for acquired and congenital lesions.Cong Heart Dis. 2017; 12: 644-646Crossref PubMed Scopus (5) Google Scholar,4Kitamura S. A new arena in cardiac surgery. Pediatric coronary artery bypass surgery.Proc Jpn Acad Ser B Phys Biol Sci. 2018; 94: 1-19Crossref PubMed Scopus (11) Google Scholar The use of a surgical microscope facilitates fine anastomosis. Iwata and colleagues are to be commended for demonstrating excellent results with this technique. I myself used a surgical microscope in 1994 for PCABS.4Kitamura S. A new arena in cardiac surgery. Pediatric coronary artery bypass surgery.Proc Jpn Acad Ser B Phys Biol Sci. 2018; 94: 1-19Crossref PubMed Scopus (11) Google Scholar Surgical microscopes have advanced considerably since then. Dr Eishi's group used ×20 magnification and 9-0 or 10-0 sutures, which were reasonable under ×10 to 20 magnification. Continuing practice may be necessary to maintain expert hands, although infant coronary bypass is fortunately rare. Nowadays, brain surgeons, ophthalmologists, ear–nose–throat surgeons, orthopedic surgeons, and plastic surgeons all use microscopes, and lymphatic vessel anastomosis has become possible. Why is this not the case for young pediatric cardiac surgeons? Try it, you may like it. I hope this publication contributes to changing pediatric cardiac surgeons’ minds and viewpoints. The author is grateful to Dr Hiroaki Kawata, Department of Cardiac Surgery, Osaka Women's and Children's Hospital, Osaka, Japan, for allowing him to use the coronary angiogram of the right panel of the Figure 1. Infant coronary artery bypass grafting completely under surgical microscopeJTCVS TechniquesVol. 10PreviewWith an increase in congenital heart surgeries such as arterial switch operation (ASO) or the Ross procedure, coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) in infants has become an increasingly important option because of coronary obstruction as a result of coronary manipulation.1,2 CABG in infants includes technical challenges associated with operating on small vessels. A microscope is, therefore, a promising tool to assist CABG in infants in achieving successful coronary revascularization.3,4 This case series introduces 4 infants who underwent total microscopic CABG. Full-Text PDF Open Access
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle