BM-DDPG: An Integrated Dispatching Framework for Ride-Hailing Systems
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper proposes an integrated dispatching framework for matching drivers with riders in ride-hailing systems. The goal is to compute matching solutions that maximize social welfare and benefit both sides of the market, such that the sustainable growth of the ride-hailing system is ensured. The proposed framework integrates data-driven proactive guidance strategies with batched matching optimization to increase social welfare, improve matching rate and reduce rider wait time. Proactive guidance strategies are computed by leveraging short-term demand forecasts based on historical data. Taken the resulting guidance strategies as inputs, the batched matching algorithm computes optimal bipartite matching between drivers and riders in a batch. Using New York City taxi data from 2016 March 1st to March 31st as input, we conduct a numerical study to evaluate the performance of the proposed framework and compare it with existing approaches in the literature. Our results show that the proposed framework improves social welfare for up to 50%. It also increases the matching rate by an average of 20% and reduces the average rider wait time by over 15%. This implies a strong potential for the proposed dispatching framework to improve service quality in ride-hailing systems.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".