Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article explore les notions de temporalité qui se dégagent de l’étude ethnographique de la sculpture rituelle sur bois chez les Guna du Panama. S’appuyant sur le concept de « cartes du temps » d’Alfred Gell, il montre que la sculpture sur bois des Guna est un outil de navigation temporelle qui permet d’accéder à de multiples images du temps grâce aux qualités de ces artefacts qui acquièrent un sens à travers les relations intersubjectives. Les figures rituelles en bois donnent accès à l’action différée du temps d’origine en établissant une synchronisation avec le temps biographique humain et avec le temps des esprits qui en sont les propriétaires. La sculpture sur bois doit donc être considérée comme un processus matériel qui s’engage récursivement à la fois dans la connaissance historique et l’expérience vécue, les rendant mutuellement significatives, jetant ainsi un pont entre les processus individuels et collectifs variant avec le temps.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.012 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".