MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3198208159 · doi:10.18192/uojm.v11is1.6028

Le vaccin à ARNm, au-delà du COVID-19

2021· article· fr· W3198208159 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Léa Caya-Bissonnette

Bibliographic record

VenueUniversity of Ottawa Journal of Medicine · 2021
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldMedicine
TopicHepatitis B Virus Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)Political scienceHumanitiesMedicinePhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

La pandémie mondiale causée par la COVID-19 a occasionné beaucoup de turbulences dans la dernière année et, chose certaine, beaucoup d’énergie et de financement ont été attribués au développement de vaccins pour inoculer la population mondiale. Cet effort collectif en quête de vaccin avancera-t-elle par inadvertance la recherche sur le cancer?

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.092
Threshold uncertainty score0.184

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.262
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUniversity of Ottawa Journal of MedicineSame topicHepatitis B Virus StudiesFrench-language works237,207