MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3198220533 · doi:10.1002/essoar.10505440.1

Diagnosing Primary Condensation Rate Attributed to the Moisture Convergence: Applications to Atmospheric River Analysis and Extratropical Storm Classification

2020· article· en· W3198220533 on OpenAlexaffabout
Ruping Mo

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicClimate variability and models
Canadian institutionsEnvironment and Climate Change Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsExtratropical cycloneStormNational weather serviceEnvironmental scienceMeteorologyClimatologyMoistureWinter stormConvergence (economics)Climate changeGeographyGeologyOceanography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abnormally heavy precipitation events can lead to numerous hazards, including flooding, landslides, and avalanches. Their developments require a sufficient supply of moisture and some physical mechanism to produce condensation. Atmospheric rivers (ARs) defined as long and narrow corridors of strong horizontal moisture transport can provide such necessary conditions. The presence and strength of ARs are often described using the integrated water vapor (IWV) and the integrated vapor transport (IVT). However, the associated precipitation is not directly correlated with these two variables. It is the net convergence of moisture that determines the intensity of precipitation. The purpose of this study is to illustrate, in the context of AR analysis, how the converged vapor should be distributed between condensation and air moistening. A simple algorithm is proposed for estimating the heavy precipitation attributable to the IVT convergence. Bearing a strong resemblance to the Kuo-Anthes parameterization scheme for cumulus convection, the proposed algorithm calculates the large-scale primary condensation rate (PCR) as a proportion of the IVT convergence, with a reduction to account for the general moistening in the atmosphere. The amount of reduction is determined by the column relative humidity (CRH), which is defined as the ratio of IWV to its saturation counterpart. It is found that the PCR in an air column with CRH < 0.60 is negligibly small. Based on a one-year dataset from the Canadian global numerical weather prediction (NWP) model, the best cut-off value of CRH for the algorithm is 0.66. It is demonstrated that this diagnosable PCR compares well to the forecast precipitation rate given by the NWP model. Case studies are conducted to illustrate the usefulness of CRH and PCR as two complements to standard AR analysis and impact-based storm classification.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.055
Threshold uncertainty score0.110

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.252
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicClimate variability and models→French-language works237,207→