MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3198220799 · doi:10.14288/1.0401788

Microwave responses of strongly demagnetized metallic samples

2021· article· en· W3198220799 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenuecIRcle (University of British Columbia) · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicElectromagnetic Effects on Materials
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMaterials science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The microwave magnetic responses of realistic, strongly-demagnetized hexagonal platelet samples were studied using numerical simulations in COMSOL Multiphysics®, in the context of cavity bolometric and cavity perturbation experiments. The effects of sample conductivity and edge rounding on this response are investigated in detail. Emphasis was placed on the specific sample geometries, material conductivities, and measurement frequencies of previously-performed cavity bolometric broadband measurements of palladium cobaltate (PdCoO₂) samples. Simulations of samples with finite conductivity in three dimensions presented numerical difficulties, which prevented the direct determination of the microwave responses of realistic hexagonal samples to sufficient accuracies. Therefore, a two-step approach was used to arrive at experimentally relevant results. As a first step, perfectly conducting, sharp-edged hexagonal platelet samples were simulated with geometry-necessitated three-dimensional models, as this case allowed the response within the sample bulk to be completely ignored; this in turn greatly reduced model complexities and enabled the response to be determined to high precision. As a second step, two-dimensional axisymmetric models were used to accurately simulate the responses of disks with both finite skin depths and finite edge radii. Comparing the responses of realistic disks to those of perfectly conducting, sharp-edged disks made it possible to estimate the relative reduction in sample power dissipation as a function of both the skin depth and of sample edge radius. By direct analogy between the disk and hexagonal samples, these two threads were woven to provide estimates of the power dissipation of the PdCoO₂ samples that were studied in the broadband experiments.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.984
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.171
Teacher spread0.163 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it