Manajemen Sarana Dan Prasarana Pendidikan di SMA Negeri 1 Trienggadeng Pidie Jaya
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Tujuan penelitian ini adalah Perencanaan kebutuhan sarana dan prasarana pendidikan, proses pengadaan sarana dan prasarana pendidikan, proses pemeliharaan dan kriteria penghapusan sarana dan prasarana pendidikan pada SMA Negeri 1 Trienggadeng. Pengumpulan data dilakukan dengan teknik observasi, wawancara dan studi dokumentasi. Subjek penelitiannya adalah kepala sekolah, koordinator bagian sarana dan prasarana, guru-guru dan kepala tata usaha. Adapun hasil penelitiannya adalah sebagai berikut: (1) Relevansi perencanaan disesuaikan dengan kebutuhan sekolah dan dana yang tersedia; (2) Relevansi proses pengadaan berdasarkan perencanaan dan ketersediaan anggaran; (3) Relevansi proses Pemeliharaan sarana dan prasarana pendidikan disesuaikan dengan jumlah dana yang dianggarkan untuk pemeliharaan dan sarana dan prasarana perlu diservis dan diperbaharui secara berkala; dan (4) Kriteria penghapusan sarana dan prasarana pendidikan sesuai aturan yang telah ditentukan. Salah satu kriteria penghapusan apabila barangnya rusak dan tidak layak lagi dipakai dan bentuk penghapusannya dapat berupa peleburan, daur ulang dan pelelangan.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it