MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3198308865 · doi:10.1021/acsomega.1c03598

Chemometric Classification of Oil Families in the Laizhouwan Depression, Bohai Bay Basin, Eastern China

2021· article· en· W3198308865 on OpenAlexaff
Zhongjian Tan, Jiawei Guo, Haiping Huang

Bibliographic record

VenueACS Omega · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsSedimentary depositional environmentBayGeologySteraneEnvironmental chemistryGeochemistryChemistryEnvironmental scienceSource rockHopanoidsStructural basinPaleontologyOceanography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

High Resolution Image Download MS PowerPoint Slide A suite of oil-sand bitumen and crude oil samples, collected from the Laizhouwan depression, Bohai Bay basin, were geochemically investigated for molecular compositions. Three oil families (A, B, and C) were classified by hierarchical cluster analysis (HCA) and principal component analysis on nine typical biomarker ratios. Typically, family A oils are characterized by relatively low values of gammacerane/C 31 homohopane 22R (G/H31, 0.13–0.76) and C 35 /C 34 homohopane (H35/H34, 0.39–0.78), suggesting a source from freshwater depositional environments. In contrast, family C oils show a relatively high G/H31 (2.49–5.41) and H35/H34 (1.43–2.45) ratios, indicating a source from hypersaline water depositional environments. Family B oils display ratios of G/H31 and H35/H34 in-between the range of families A and C, suggesting mixed origin. In addition, family A oils can be further classified into four subfamilies (A1, A2, A3, and A4) and family B oils into two subfamilies (B1 and B2) by HCA. The A1 oils characterized by a high C 24 tetracyclic terpane/C 26 tricyclic terpane (TeT24/TT26) ratio (1.02–1.39) are mainly distributed in the northeast, B1 oils characterized by relatively low TeT24/TT26 ratio are in the west, and A2, A3, and A4 oils with an intermediate TeT24/TT26 ratio are in the center of the depression. Oils in well L16-1-2 in the southern depression, however, show vertical variations with family C oils in the deeper reservoirs, subfamily B2 oils in the shallower reservoirs, and subfamily A4 oils in the middle-depth reservoirs. Based on the biomarker compositions, at least three oil charges were indicated: family C oils are likely sourced from the Es4 rock in the southern sag, B2 oils may be a mixture of family C with family A oils, and A4 oils without biodegradation influence may be the latest charge derived from the Es3 source rock in the northern sag. The oil families and/or subfamilies with typical genetic affinities, as well as the regular occurrence in different blocks, may indicate two major petroleum systems or multiple subsidiary oil systems existing in the Laizhouwan depression.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.075
Threshold uncertainty score0.148

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.229
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueACS OmegaSame topicHydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysisFrench-language works237,207