MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3198354314 · doi:10.3390/min11090980

Bi8Te3, the 11-Atom Layer Member of the Tetradymite Homologous Series

2021· article· en· W3198354314 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Cristiana L. Ciobanu, Ashley D. Slattery, Nigel J. Cook, Benjamin P. Wade, Kathy Ehrig

Bibliographic record

VenueMinerals · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicIron-based superconductors research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHomologous seriesCrystallographyScanning transmission electron microscopyAtom (system on chip)Crystal structureMaterials scienceElectron diffractionPhase (matter)DiffractionTransmission electron microscopyChemistryPhysicsOpticsNanotechnology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Bi8Te3 is a member of the tetradymite homologous series, previously shown to be compositionally and structurally distinct from hedleyite, Bi7Te3, yet inadequately characterized structurally. The phase is identified in a sample from the Hedley district, British Columbia, Canada. Compositions are documented by electron probe microanalysis and structures are directly imaged using high-angle annular dark field (HAADF) scanning transmission electron microscopy (STEM). Results confirm that Bi8Te3 has an 11-atom layer structure, in which three Bi-Bi pairs are placed adjacent to the five-atom sequence (Te-Bi-Te-Bi-Te). Bi8Te3 has trigonal symmetry (space group R3¯m) with unit cell dimensions of a = ~4.4 Å and c = ~63 Å calculated from measurements on representative electron diffraction patterns. The model is assessed by STEM simulations and EDS mapping, all displaying good agreement with the HAADF STEM imaging. Lattice-scale intergrowths are documented in phases replacing Bi8Te3, accounting for the rarity of this phase in nature. These results support prior predictions of crystal structures in the tetradymite homologous series from theoretical modeling and indicate that other phases are likely to exist for future discovery. Tetradymite homologues are mixed-layer compounds derived as one-dimensional superstructures of a basic rhombohedral sub-cell. Each member of the series has a discrete stoichiometric composition and unique crystal structure.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.288
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMineralsSame topicIron-based superconductors researchFrench-language works237,207