MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3198368380 · doi:10.1002/ncp.10756

Challenges in parenteral nutrition in adult ultrashort gut: A case of cachexia

2021· article· en· W3198368380 on OpenAlexaff
Lindsey Russell, Leah Gramlich

Bibliographic record

VenueNutrition in Clinical Practice · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNursing
TopicClinical Nutrition and Gastroenterology
Canadian institutionsUniversity of AlbertaMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineShort bowel syndromeCachexiaParenteral nutritionAnabolismVolvulusIntensive care medicineGastroenterologyInternal medicineCancer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Patients with ultrashort gut have inadequate nutrient absorption. Parenteral nutrition (PN) is required to meet nutrition requirements caused by chronic intestinal failure (IF). We present a case of cachexia and IF caused by ultrashort gut following an extensive small-bowel resection caused by volvulus that was complicated by small-bowel ischemia. Targeting energy prescriptions to optimize PN using indirect calorimetry in this population with ultrashort gut has not been reported in adults. This case serves to outline the challenges in optimizing PN, including factors such as anabolic status, to meet nutrition requirements in patients with ultrashort gut and cachexia.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.016
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Meta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.228
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.016
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.143
GPT teacher head0.459
Teacher spread0.316 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNutrition in Clinical PracticeSame topicClinical Nutrition and GastroenterologyFrench-language works237,207