MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3198426611 · doi:10.31276/vjst.63(8).40-43

Researching on influence factorsand value confirmation of elasticmodulus (Eac), layer coefficient (ai)of some types of hot dense asphalt concrete in Vietnam

2021· article· en· W3198426611 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Quang Phuc Nguyen, van Thang Vu

Bibliographic record

VenueMinistry of Science and Technology Vietnam · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAsphalt Pavement Performance Evaluation
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAsphaltLayer (electronics)ModulusValue (mathematics)Asphalt pavementAsphalt concreteMaterials scienceStructural engineeringGeotechnical engineeringForensic engineeringMathematicsEngineeringComposite materialStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The method of designing flexible road structures under the guidance of AASHTO 1993 was used in many states in the US and Canada and is being applied by many other countries in Europe and Asia. The layer coefficient ai in the AASHTO design equation represents an empirical relationship between the structural index SN and thickness. The value of the layer coefficients (ai) is specified for each material layer depending on the quality shown mainly through resilient modulus. This paper presents the initial research results of influencing factors and value confirmation of resilient modulus (Eac) and layer coefficients (ai) of some types of hot dense asphalt concrete in Vietnam.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.032
Threshold uncertainty score0.064

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.285
Teacher spread0.270 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMinistry of Science and Technology VietnamSame topicAsphalt Pavement Performance EvaluationFrench-language works237,207