MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3198482867 · doi:10.20986/resed.2021.3826/2020

Perfil epidemiológico del dolor secundario a neuropatía periférica moderada diabética

2021· article· es· W3198482867 on OpenAlex
Paola Berenice Zavala Ambriz, Enrique Villarreal-Rı́os, Emma Rosa Vargas-Daza, Liliana Galicia Rodríguez, Catalina Lara Maya

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueRevista de la Sociedad Española del Dolor · 2021
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldMedicine
TopicPain Mechanisms and Treatments
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Antecedentes y objetivo: La neuropatía diabética es una complicación de la diabetes tipo 2. Afecta el entorno individual, familiar y social. El objetivo es identificar el perfil epidemiológico del dolor secundario a neuropatía periférica moderada diabética. Materiales y métodos: Estudio transversal descriptivo del dolor utilizando como fuente de información el paciente con neuropatía periférica moderada secundaria a diabetes tipo 2. La severidad de la neuropatía periférica diabética fue establecida con la escala de Michigan. El tamaño de la muestra fue 145. El perfil epidemiológico del dolor evaluado con el cuestionario multidimensional de McGill, alfa de Cronbach de 0,88, evalúa la intensidad de dolor en tres categorías independientes (índice de valoración total -dimensión sensorial, afectiva y evolutiva-, intensidad total general e intensidad total actual) y al interior identifica las características específicas del dolor. El análisis estadístico incluyó promedios, desviación estándar, intervalo de confianza para promedios y porcentajes. Resultados: Índice de valoración total de dolor 9,74 ± 1,40 (IC 95 %; 9,51-9,97), dimensión sensorial 5,02 ± 0,84 (IC 95 %; 4,88-5,16), dimensión afectiva 3,75 ± 0,94 (IC 95 %; 3,59-3,90) y dimensión evolutiva 0,96 ± 0,18 (IC 95 %; 0,93-1,00). Las características de la valoración total de dolor identifican sacudida 35,2 %, ardiente/quemante 31,0 %, sofocante 40,0 %, agotador 33,1 %, deprimente 29,7 % y constante 35,2 %. Intensidad total general de dolor 7,70 ± 1,29 (IC 95 %; 7,49-7,91). Intensidad total actual 40,7 % “intenso”. Conclusión: El perfil epidemiológico del dolor es de intensidad elevada, quemante, penetrante, tirante fijo o difuso, acompañado de picor generalmente constante, con repercusión emocional negativa, entre ellas sentimiento de ansiedad, secundario a dolor deprimente, agotador, sofocante y mortificante.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.658
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.299
Teacher spread0.281 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it