Hubungan Fungsi Kognitif Dengan Keseimbangan Pada Lansia Dengan Mild Cognitive Impairment
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objective: To determine the relationship between cognitive function and balance in the elderly within Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) conditions at Posyandu, Talawi, Taratak Capo Hamlet. Method: This type of research is a descriptive correlative study using a cross sectional approach with the identification of purposive sampling on 72 sample. To assess cognitive levels, its make use of the Indonesian-Montreal Cognitive Assessment (INA-MoCA) questionnaire and balance measurement using the Time Up and Go Test (TUGT). Results: Correlation test with Pearson Product Moment obtained a significant relationship with p = 0.014 where p <value α (0.05) with r = 0.290, Which means there is a significant correlation between cognitive function and balance, where the higher the value of cognitive function, the higher balance value. Mean and standard deviation of Cognitive Function is 19.49 ± 2.089 and 18.06 ± 2.443 for balance. Conclusion: There is a relationship between cognitive function and balance in the elderly with Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) conditions in Posyandu, Talawi District, Taratak Capo Hamlet.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".