MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3198647494 · doi:10.1093/ahr/rhab242

M<scp>atthew</scp> R. B<scp>ahar</scp>. <i>Storm of the Sea: Indians and Empires in the Atlantic’s Age of Sail</i>.

2021· article· en· W3198647494 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Jeffers Lennox

Bibliographic record

VenueThe American Historical Review · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHistorical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIndigenousScholarshipColonialismHistoryAsideNova scotiaAllianceEthnologyGeographyAncient historyArchaeologyPolitical scienceArtLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In Storm of the Sea: Indians and Empires in the Atlantic’s Age of Sail, Matthew R. Bahar offers readers a maritime history of the Indigenous homelands we now call Maine, New Brunswick, and Nova Scotia. These homelands—Mi’kma’ki, Wulstukwik, and the Dawnland—are terraqueous places that were dominated by Indigenous peoples well into the eighteenth century. The Wabanaki peoples—a loose confederacy of Mi’kmaq, Wulstukwiuk, Passamaquoddy, Penobscot, and Abenaki nations—employed a blue water policy to keep European settlers hemmed into pales along the northeast Atlantic coast. Bahar argues persuasively that understanding Indigenous peoples’ ability to maintain their homelands in this part of North America requires a deeper consideration of their maritime strength. Where older colonial scholarship sang tired songs of Indigenous peoples as nuisances to be swept aside as settlers built a “new world,” Bahar joins a chorus of nuanced scholarship illuminating the weakness of those settlers, most of whom lived in...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.188
Threshold uncertainty score0.993

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.241
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe American Historical ReviewSame topicHistorical Studies and Socio-cultural AnalysisFrench-language works237,207