MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3198682222 · doi:10.1016/j.jcf.2021.08.025

TeleHealth or TeleWealth? Equity challenges for the future of cystic fibrosis care (Commentary)

2021· letter· en· W3198682222 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Alessandro N. Franciosi, Bradley S. Quon

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Cystic Fibrosis · 2021
Typeletter
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCystic Fibrosis Research Advances
Canadian institutionsSt. Paul's HospitalUniversity of British Columbia
FundersMichael Smith Health Research BCCystic Fibrosis Foundation
KeywordsTelehealthMedicineEthnic groupPandemicScopusHealth careEquity (law)TelemedicineCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)Family medicineMEDLINEDiseaseInternal medicinePolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The COVID-19 pandemic has resulted in an accelerated transition to telehealth-delivered care for people with CF [1], providing a welcome alternative for both patients and CF multi-disciplinary teams who were struggling to balance the risks and benefits of in-person care during an unprecedented healthcare crisis [2]. Telehealth (TH) will undoubtedly play a role in the future of CF care but paradigm shifts in well-established care delivery models can generate unexpected service blind spots, some of which risk perpetuating existing healthcare disparities.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.050
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: Commentary
Teacher disagreement score0.037
Threshold uncertainty score0.074

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.050
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0040.005
Scholarly communication0.0050.011
Open science0.0040.004
Research integrity0.0340.031
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0220.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.356
Teacher spread0.311 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2021
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Cystic FibrosisSame topicCystic Fibrosis Research AdvancesFrench-language works237,207