Allantoin and natrosulfatourea, two new bat-guano minerals from the Rowley mine, Maricopa County, Arizona, USA
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT The new minerals allantoin (IMA2020–004a), C4H6N4O3, and natrosulfatourea (IMA2019–134), Na2(SO4)[CO(NH2)2], were found in the Rowley mine, Maricopa County, Arizona, USA, where they occur together in bat guano in association with aphthitalite and urea. Allantoin properties: colorless, transparent, untwinned blades to 0.3 mm; white streak; vitreous luster; brittle; Mohs hardness 1½; conchoidal fracture; good {100} cleavage; 1.72(2) g/cm3 density; biaxial (+) with α = 1.558(2), β = 1.593(2), γ = 1.715(3); 2V = 60(1)°; slight r > v dispersion; optical orientation: Y = b, Z ^ a = 30° in obtuse β. Natrosulfatourea properties: colorless, transparent, untwinned prisms to 0.3 mm; white streak; vitreous luster; brittle; Mohs hardness 1½; irregular fracture; perfect {100} cleavage; 1.97(2) g/cm3 density; biaxial (+) with α = 1.456(2), β = 1.464(5), γ = 1.524(2); 2V = 42(1)°; no dispersion; optical orientation: X = a, Y = c, Z = b. Quantitative chemical analyses could not be obtained for allantoin. Electron microprobe analyses provided the empirical formula Na2.02(S0.98O4)[CO(NH2)2] for natrosulfatourea. Allantoin is monoclinic, P21/c, a = 8.0304(9), b = 5.1596(5), c = 14.8011(18) Å, β = 93.017(7)°, V = 612.41(11) Å3, and Z = 4. Natrosufatourea is orthorhombic, Pbcn, a = 5.5918(4), b = 18.1814(14), c = 6.7179(5) Å, V = 682.98(9) Å3, and Z = 4. The crystal structure of allantoin (R1 = 0.0432 for 1073 I > 2σI) is the same as that reported for the equivalent organic compound. In the structure of natrosulfatourea (R1 = 0.0413 for 785 I > 2σI) NaO6 polyhedra and SO4 tetrahedra form polyhedral layers. The O atom of the CO(NH2)2 (urea) group ligates to two Na atoms and projects into the space between polyhedral layers, linking adjacent layers through hydrogen bonds.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".