MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3198790242 · doi:10.1016/j.ienj.2021.101049

Front-line emergency department nurses’ and physicians’ assessments of processes of elder-friendly care for quality improvement

2021· article· en· W3198790242 on OpenAlex
Deniz Cetin‐Sahin, Jane McCusker, Antonio Ciampi, Sylvie Cossette, Thien Tuong Minh Vu, Nathalie Veillette, Francine Ducharme, Éric Belzile, Paul-André Lachance, Rick Mah, Simon Berthelot

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Emergency Nursing · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicFrailty in Older Adults
Canadian institutionsCentre hospitalier de l'Université LavalCentre Hospitalier de l’Université de MontréalCentre hospitalier universitaire de QuébecInstitut Universitaire de Gériatrie de MontréalMontreal Heart InstituteMcGill University Health CentreInstitut universitaire en santé mentale de MontréalSt Mary's Hospital Centre
FundersFonds de Recherche du Québec - SantéSt Mark's Hospital Foundation
KeywordsFront lineEmergency departmentMedicineFamily medicineEmergency nursingNursingMEDLINE

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.605
Threshold uncertainty score0.794

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.406
Teacher spread0.376 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it