Les bons sentiments / Natalie Jean, Le goût des pensées sauvages, Montréal, Leméac, 2020, 139 p.
Why is this work in the frame?
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame — the usual design — would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.
The three-model screen
all 1,000 screened works →All three models called this out of scope.
Book review of a literary work; abstract absent but the title is unambiguous.
It is a bibliographic literary review rather than research about research.
Literary book review format; no abstract, but title is not about research as object.
Abstract
No abstract. This is not a gap in this database — OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.
The record
- Venue
- Érudit (Université de Montréal)
- Topic
- French Urban and Social Studies
- Field
- Social Sciences
- Canadian institutions
- —
- Funders
- —
- Keywords
- HumanitiesPhilosophyArt
- Has abstract in OpenAlex
- no