Bibliographic record
Abstract
Herein, exact algebraic expressions for the non-circulatory (added-mass) forces on elliptic airfoils are derived for any two-dimensional motion – including simultaneous rectilinear acceleration and rotation – embedded in a steady free-stream flow. Despite the lengthy history of the added-mass concept and its widespread application to cylinders of various cross-sections, such closed-form expressions for elliptic cylinders, in terms of kinematic and geometric parameters alone, have remained absent from the literature until now. Inspection of the derived equations reveals that for pure pitching about a point on the chord-line, increasing thickness always decreases the added-mass force magnitude. For any given motion of the chord-line, the difference in force between thick and thin airfoils is proportional to the square of the thickness, although this difference may be positive or negative for the general three-degree-of-freedom case. In the special case of zero thickness and small pitch angles, Theodorsen's added-mass lift force on rigid thin airfoils is recovered; for large pitch angles, an exact generalization of Theodorsen's expression, applicable to the chord-normal direction, is given.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".