Les enjeux intrapsychiques reliés aux interventions de soutien à la famille défavorisée
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Selon les fondements sur lesquels il repose, le soutien aux familles défavorisées véhicule des messages implicites pouvant nuire ou favoriser la prise en charge d’une résolution de problèmes par la famille même. Nous présentons une exploration théorique des enjeux intrapsychiques de la relation de soutien et leur impact sur la réduction de l’écart relationnel entre les parents et les professionnels qui travaillent auprès de leurs enfants. Deux orientations seront analysées : a) l’intervention de type compensatoire qui n’implique pas la famille dans la prise de décision et favorise sa dépendance aux services sociaux; et b) l’intervention socioconstructiviste qui soutient le processus d’appropriation et l’autonomie. Nous analyserons cette dynamique à l’aide des travaux de Bronfenbrenner et de Vygotski, pour mieux connaître le processus en jeu et établir des liens entre les contextes sociaux, l’acquisition de pouvoir et l’emprise personnelle.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.008 | 0.018 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".