MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3198949349 · doi:10.71318/apom.2015.69.1.45

Black Knot [Apiosporina Morbosa(Schw.)] Resistance in Importedand Domestic Prunus DomesticaL. Germplasm andCultivars

2015· article· en· W3198949349 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of American Pomological Society · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPlant Physiology and Cultivation Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGermplasmBiologyCultivarPrunusKnot (papermaking)HorticultureBotanyPrunus salicina

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Black knot Apiosporina morbosa(Schw.) (BK) is an important fungal disease of Prunus domesticaand other Prunus species in North America. BK causes economic losses in the plum growing regions of northern and eastern U.S., and eastern Canada. Relatively few P. domesticacommercial cultivars are resistant to BK. Evaluation of resistance to BK in P. domesticaplums including an evaluation of infection of new shoot growth following pruning was carried out over four years. The 43 genotypes evaluated included 23 accessions from the U.S. National Plant Germplasm System (NPGS)-Davis, California and cultivars and selections from the U.S., Canada, and Europe. Based on the evaluations, genotypes were classified as highly resistant, moderately resistant, susceptible or highly susceptible. Highly resistant genotypes, without visible symptoms made up 44% of the germplasm evaluated and of these, 68% were accessions from the U.S. NPGS collection. While the inheritance of resistance remains to be determined, these evaluations indicate that sources of high level resistance are available in P. domesticathat can be utilized in breeding highly resistant commercial cultivars.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.475
Threshold uncertainty score0.347

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.270
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of American Pomological SocietySame topicPlant Physiology and Cultivation StudiesFrench-language works237,207