Point-Line Visual Stereo SLAM Using EDlines and PL-BoW
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Visual Simultaneous Localization and Mapping (SLAM) technologies based on point features achieve high positioning accuracy and complete map construction. However, despite their time efficiency and accuracy, such SLAM systems are prone to instability and even failure in poor texture environments. In this paper, line features are integrated with point features to enhance the robustness and reliability of stereo SLAM systems in poor texture environments. Firstly, method Edge Drawing lines (EDlines) is applied to reduce the line feature detection time. Meanwhile, the proposed method improves the reliability of features by eliminating outliers of line features based on the entropy scale and geometric constraints. Furthermore, this paper proposes a novel Bags of Word (BoW) model combining the point and line features to improve the accuracy and robustness of loop detection used in SLAM. The proposed PL-BoW technique achieves this by taking into account the co-occurrence information and spatial proximity of visual words. Experiments using the KITTI and EuRoC datasets demonstrate that the proposed stereo Point and EDlines SLAM (PEL-SLAM) achieves high accuracy consistently, including in challenging environments difficult to sense accurately. The processing time of the proposed method is reduced by 9.9% and 4.5% when compared to the Point and Line SLAM (PL-SLAM) and Point and stereo Point and Line based Visual Odometry (sPLVO) methods, respectively.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".