Lutheranism in Bohemia and its (non-)reflection by papal nuncios at imperial court
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The reflections of Lutheranism in Bohemian lands by papal diplomats embody considerable variations in the light of their correspondence. The nuncios were concerned with the Bohemian Lutheranism only marginally in the 1530s as it resulted from the relative newness of this phenomenon. We encounter a significantly different situation researching the reports of nuncios dated to the last quarter of 16th Century and the beginning of 17th Century though. An important reflection of Lutheranism in Bohemian lands can be found in the correspondence of Giovanni Delfino from year 1575 who perceived his struggle against religious requirements of Bohemian estates as an obvious fight against the Augsburg confession. Lutheranism as an established confessional movement is further apparent also in despatches of his successors. In the turn of 16th and 17th Centuries, there was emphasized also the aspect of taking advantage of inner disagreements among the Lutherans and Calvinists in order to overall weakening of Protestantism in Bohemia and the Holy Roman Empire as well.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.010 | 0.013 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".