Bibliographic record
Abstract
Les écrits poétiques de Hédi Bouraoui, poète canadien d’origine tunisienne, où sont insérés des images picturales d'art brut, participent de l'intuitisme, expression artistique qui « invite au dialogue, à la conversation permanente entre les différentes cultures, à l’échange, à la création d’un espace pluriartistique dans lequel tous les arts s’expriment sans frontières »(Éric Sivry, 2003). Notre propos examinera la convergence entre la poésie de Bouraoui, l'intuitisme et l'art brut, la conception de l'intuition de Bouraoui coïncidant avec la « pure et authentique impulsion créative » d'où s'origine l'art selon Jean Dubuffet. The poetic writings of Hédi Bouraoui, a Canadian poet of Tunisian origin, where pictorial images of Raw Art are inserted, are part of intuitivism, an artistic expression that "invites dialogue, permanent conversation between different cultures, exchange, creation of a multi-artistic space in which all arts express themselves without borders" (Eric Sivry, 2003). Our article will examine the convergence between Bouraoui's poetry, intuitivism and Raw Art, Bouraoui's conception of intuition coinciding with the "pure and authentic creative impulse" from which art, according to Jean Dubuffet, originated.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.010 | 0.018 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".