Results of using L-ornitin-L-aspartate in the treatment of hepatic encephalopathy in liver transplantation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The aimwas to study the results of using various treatment regimens for hepatic encephalopathy for patients with liver cirrhosis before and after liver transplantation and the effect on the incidence and severity of hepatic encephalopathy in the perioperative period, and on the posttransplantation course.Material and methods. Fifty four patients with cirrhosis of various etiologies and the presence of significant hepatic encephalopathy undergoing living donor liver transplantation were included in the study. In the comparison group, patients took lactulose and rifaximin. In the main group, patients took lactulose and rifaximin in combination with L-ornithine-L-aspartate in the preoperative period, and L-ornithine-L-aspartate after liver transplantation for 5 days.Results. The use of L-ornithine-L-aspartate in the complex therapy of hepatic encephalopathy led to significantly reduced time of performing the Number Connection Test, the improvement of cognitive functions in patients by the Montreal Cognitive Assessment, a decreased incidence of stage II–III hepatic encephalopathy and an increased incidence of stage 0-I hepatic encephalopathy in the preoperative period. In the postoperative period, patients of the main group showed a rapid decrease in the severe stages of hepatic encephalopathy (stage II–III) towards less severe forms (stage 0–I) on the 3rd, 5th and 7th days after liver transplantation, and also a faster recovery of cognitive functions, an earlier adequate recovery of consciousness, muscle tone, an earlier possibility of extubation, a shorter length of stay in the intensive care unit, and a decreased postoperative hospital length of stay relatively to the patients of the comparison group.Conclusion. The use of L-ornithine-L-aspartate in the combination therapy for hepatic encephalopathy in the peritransplantation period leads to a significant decrease of the incidence and severity of hepatic encephalopathy, accelerates rehabilitation of patients, reduces postoperative hospital length of stay.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".