MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3199219494 · doi:10.32393/csme.2021.135

Reduced-Order Neural Network Plant Models For Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cells Using Principal Component Analysis

2021· article· en· W3199219494 on OpenAlexafffund
Chris Shum, John McPhee

Bibliographic record

VenueProgress in Canadian Mechanical Engineering. Volume 4 · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFuel Cells and Related Materials
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsPrincipal component analysisProton exchange membrane fuel cellArtificial neural networkComponent (thermodynamics)MembraneFuel cellsBiological systemProtonComputer sciencePrincipal (computer security)Order (exchange)ChemistryArtificial intelligenceChemical engineeringEngineeringPhysicsBiologyBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

High-fidelity physics-based models can represent complex systems with high accuracy but, due to high computational cost, are often ill-suited for real-time applications. Data-driven models such as neural networks can yield competitive accuracy with reduced computation cost, may capture system-specific phenomena not accounted for in physics-based models, and can be further accelerated using parallel computing. For resource-constrained applications such as embedded controllers for automotive platforms, data-driven approaches can enable use of model predictive control where an analytical physics-based model would be computationally prohibitive. A disadvantage can be the memory (static ROM and dynamic RAM) required to store the model parameters which is a key metric for feasibility of use in embedded control systems. Model complexity reduction is therefore highly desirable.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.191
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.220
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProgress in Canadian Mechanical Engineering. Volume 4Same topicFuel Cells and Related MaterialsFrench-language works237,207