MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3199268489 · doi:10.1002/mp.15238

Time domain principal component analysis for rapid, real‐time 2D MRI reconstruction from undersampled data

2021· article· en· W3199268489 on OpenAlexaff
Mark H. Wright, Bryson Dietz, Eugene Yip, Jihyun Yun, Zsolt Gabos, B. G. Fallone, Keith Wachowicz

Bibliographic record

VenueMedical Physics · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAdvanced MRI Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsAlberta Cancer FoundationUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsUndersamplingPrincipal component analysisComputer scienceTemporal resolutionPattern recognition (psychology)Time domainArtificial intelligenceCompressed sensingAlgorithmComputer visionPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

PURPOSE: A rapid real-time 2D accelerated method was developed for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) using principal component analysis (PCA) in the temporal domain. This method employs a moving window of previous dynamic frames to reconstruct the current, real-time frame within this window. This technique could be particularly useful in real-time tracking applications such as in MR-guided radiotherapy, where low latency real-time reconstructions are essential. METHODS: The method was tested retrospectively on 15 fully-sampled data sets of lung patient data acquired on a 3T Philips Achieva system. High frequency data are incoherently undersampled, while the central low-frequency data are always acquired to characterize the temporal fluctuations through PCA. The undersampling pattern is derived in such a way that all of k-space is acquired within a pre-determined number of frames. The missing data in the current frame are then filled in by fitting the temporal characterizations to the acquired undersampled data, using a pre-determined number of PCs. A subset of six patients was used to test the contour ability of the images. Various accelerations between 3x and 8x were tested along with the optimal number of PCs for fitting. A comparison was also performed with previous work from our group proposed by Dietz et al. as well as with a standard low resolution acquisition. In order to determine how the method would perform at lower signal to noise ratio (SNR), noise levels of 2×, 4×, and 6× were added to the 3T data. Metrics such as normalised mean square error and Dice coefficient were used to measure the reconstruction image quality and contour ability. RESULTS: The proposed method demonstrated good temporal robustness as consistent metrics were detected for the duration of the imaging session. It was found that the optimal number of PCs for temporal fitting was dependent on the acceleration rate. For the data tested, five PCs were found to be optimal at the acceleration rates of 3× and 4×. This number decreases to three at accelerations of 5× and 6× and further decreases to two at an acceleration rate of 8×, likely due to greater instability with fewer acquired data points. The use of too many PCs for fitting increased the chances of noisy reconstruction which affected contourability. CONCLUSIONS: The proposed 2D real-time MR acceleration method demonstrated greater robustness in the metrics over time when compared with previous real-time PCA methods using metrics such as normalised mean squared error, peak SNR and structural similarity up to an acceleration of 8x. Improved temporal robustness of image structure contourability and accurate definition was also demonstrated using several metrics including the Dice coefficient. Reconstruction of raw acquired data can be performed at approximately 50 ms per frame using an Intel core i5 CPU. The method has the advantage of being very flexible in terms of hardware requirements as it can operate successfully on a single coil channel and does not require specialized computing power to implement in real-time.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.049
GPT teacher head0.339
Teacher spread0.290 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMedical PhysicsSame topicAdvanced MRI Techniques and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207