MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3199285557 · doi:10.1109/tps.2021.3109170

A New Hybrid Pulsed Power Circuit Topology for Gas Laser Applications

2021· article· en· W3199285557 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Plasma Science · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicLaser Design and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsThyratronPulsed powerTransformerElectronic circuitElectrical engineeringComputer scienceTopology (electrical circuits)Pulse generatorElectronic engineeringVoltageEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A major decision surrounding the design of pulsed power circuits for gas lasers is the choice between a thyratron and solid-state switches. The thyratron is a mature device technology whose cost is increasing. The ratings of solid-state switches still do not match those of a thyratron. Pulse transformer and pulse compression circuits must be added to overcome the lower ratings of solid-state switches leading to a higher parts count and cost. This article proposes a new solid-state pulse power topology called the hybrid circuit topology to address the parts count and cost issue. The hybrid circuit makes use of a combination of capacitive and inductive energy storage to reduce the time required to transfer the energy from the transformer primary to the secondary side. This ultimately reduces the quantity of magnetic material used in the pulse compression circuit.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.978
Threshold uncertainty score0.588

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it