MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3199356250 · doi:10.1101/2021.09.15.460508

Gram-negative bacterial infection increases lung cancer metastasis via Toll-like receptor activation and increased cancer cell proliferation post-tumor adhesion

2021· preprint· en· W3199356250 on OpenAlexafffund
Roni Rayes, Marnie Goodwin Wilson, Stephen Gowing, France Bourdeau, Betty Giannias, Sophie Camilleri‐Broët, Pierre Fiset, Sara Najmeh, Jonathan Spicer, Lorenzo Ferri, Jonathan Cools‐Lartigue

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2021
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicImmunotherapy and Immune Responses
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityMcGill University Health Centre
FundersMcGill University Health Centre
KeywordsLung cancerMetastasisTLR4CancerMedicineIn vivoCancer researchCancer cellContext (archaeology)ImmunologyPathologyBiologyInflammationInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Lung cancer is a leading cause of death partially due to high recurrence rates after surgical resection. Clinical data suggest that post-operative infections may increase the risk of recurrence. Our previous work indicated that increased adhesion of circulating tumors in the context of infection is partially responsible for this phenotype. However, cancer metastasis is a multi-step process, and it is likely that other events following tumor adhesion also play a role. Methods In vivo intrasplenic injection of murine lung cancer cells into wild type (WT) and Toll-like receptor 4 knockout (TLR4 -/- ) mice followed by cecal-ligation and puncture (CLP) as a model of post-operative infection or sham surgery were used. H&E staining and immunohistochemistry analysis of Ki67+ cells in the livers of those mice were performed. In vitro proliferation assays were performed on human lung cancer cells using combinations of TLR blockade. Results We found a 5-fold increase in hepatic metastases in WT CLP mice compared to WT sham mice. TLR4 -/- CLP mice had a significant decreased tumor burden compared to WT CLP mice. This indicated an important mechanistic role for the TLR4-initiated host response to gram negative infection post-tumor cell adhesion. By analyzing the livers of those mice, we observed an increase in proliferation of tumor micrometastases in vivo in WT CLP mice as compared to WT sham mice. Here again, CLP TLR4 -/- mice had significantly fewer replicating micrometastases than CLP WT mice. Indeed, we found that direct stimulation of lung cancer cells with heat-inactivated E . Coli resulted in increased proliferation of tumor growth in vitro . These effects were partially abrogated by tumor TLR4 blockade; combined TLR2, 4 and 5 blockades led to a more prominent decrease. Conditioned media from bronchoalveolar epithelial cells treated with lipopolysaccharide lead to increased lung cancer proliferation; these changes were reversed with TLR blockade, indicating that the host response to infection is TLR mediated. Conclusions Overall, these results imply a more complex mechanistic role of post-operative infection in metastasis. From a clinical standpoint, this evidence strengthens the case for the use of TLR blockade as a potential therapeutic target in the prevention of metastasis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)→Same topicImmunotherapy and Immune Responses→French-language works237,207→