ABSCESSOS INTRACRANIANOS DE ORIGENS ODONTOGÊNICAS – REVISÃO DA LITERATURA
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abscessos Intracranianos de origens odontogenicas sao complicacoes sistemicas graves e com risco de vida para o paciente, originando-se de um foco infeccioso de origem dentaria os abscessos intracranianos por meio de disseminacao hematogenica atingem as regioes intracranianas. O objetivo deste estudo e relatar por meio de uma revisao de literatura e relatos de casos clinicos, a evolucao de infeccoes de origens odontogenicas e suas complicacoes sistemicas. Para realizar esse levantamento foram utilizadas as bases de dados Canadian Dental Association e PubMed. Uma vez que abscessos intracranianos se originam de diferentes focos infecciosos se torna dificil detectar a origem que levou ao foco infeccioso intracraniano, a analise microbiologica se torna primordial para a interpretacao da origem da infeccao, na literatura revisada, em 31 casos de abscessos intracranianos 13% deles mostraram microbiota de anaerobicos presentes na cavidade oral. Com isso, se torna evidente a importância da conduta correta que o profissional de odontologia deve ter para se evitar tais agravos sistemicos, o correto diagnostico, tratamento e a associacao ou nao de antibioticoterapia para cada caso.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.012 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.013 | 0.011 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".