Combining Knowledge Graph and Word Embeddings for Spherical Topic Modeling
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Probabilistic topic models are considered as an effective framework for text analysis that uncovers the main topics in an unlabeled set of documents. However, the inferred topics by traditional topic models are often unclear and not easy to interpret because they do not account for semantic structures in language. Recently, a number of topic modeling approaches tend to leverage domain knowledge to enhance the quality of the learned topics, but they still assume a multinomial or Gaussian document likelihood in the Euclidean space, which often results in information loss and poor performance. In this article, we propose a Bayesian embedded spherical topic model (ESTM) that combines both knowledge graph and word embeddings in a non-Euclidean curved space, the hypersphere, for better topic interpretability and discriminative text representations. Extensive experimental results show that our proposed model successfully uncovers interpretable topics and learns high-quality text representations useful for common natural language processing (NLP) tasks across multiple benchmark datasets.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it