Off-line approximate dynamic programming for the vehicle routing problem with stochastic customers and demands via decentralized decision-making
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper studies a stochastic variant of the vehicle routing problem (VRP) where both customer locations and demands are uncertain. In particular, potential customers are not restricted to a predefined customer set but are continuously spatially distributed in a given service area. The objective is to maximize the served demands while fulfilling vehicle capacities and time restrictions. We call this problem the VRP with stochastic customers and demands (VRPSCD). For this problem, we first propose a Markov Decision Process (MDP) formulation representing the classical centralized decision-making perspective where one decision-maker establishes the routes of all vehicles. While the resulting formulation turns out to be intractable, it provides us with the ground to develop a new MDP formulation of the VRPSCD representing a decentralized decision-making framework, where vehicles autonomously establish their own routes. This new formulation allows us to develop several strategies to reduce the dimension of the state and action spaces, resulting in a considerably more tractable problem. We solve the decentralized problem via Reinforcement Learning, and in particular, we develop a Q-learning algorithm featuring state-of-the-art acceleration techniques such as Replay Memory and Double Q Network. Computational results show that our method considerably outperforms two commonly adopted benchmark policies (random and heuristic). Moreover, when comparing with existing literature, we show that our approach can compete with specialized methods developed for the particular case of the VRPSCD where customer locations and expected demands are known in advance. Finally, we show that the value functions and policies obtained by our algorithm can be easily embedded in Rollout algorithms, thus further improving their performances.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".