MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Autonomous Snowblower Utilizing Internet of Things for Minimal Power Consumption

2021· article· en· W3199493764 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicExperimental Learning in Engineering
Canadian institutionsOntario Tech University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceAutomationInternet of ThingsThe InternetPower consumptionArchitecturePower (physics)Artificial intelligenceComputer securityDistributed computingEmbedded systemWorld Wide WebEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Internet of Things (IoT) has allowed devices to connect to external services and utilize outside information to create knowledge about their tasks and decide more intelligently regarding their processes. This paper presents an architecture to develop a novel autonomous snowblower concept that uses IoT to intelligently determine the best times to clear a driveway. By examining weather data for the area of operation, the snowblower will combine computer vision and Visual Simultaneous Localization and Mapping (VSLAM) to effectively clear an area of snow before accumulation becomes too much for the electric motors to handle. This combination of IoT and conventional automation allows for a tradeoff between intelligence and power. The developed framework shows the benefits of IoT on a device like this, and how a lower power device, used intelligently, can be an effective solution for a larger problem.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.232
Threshold uncertainty score0.631

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicExperimental Learning in EngineeringFrench-language works237,207