MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Autonomous Snowblower Utilizing Internet of Things for Minimal Power Consumption

2021· article· en· W3199493764 on OpenAlexaff
Tristan Zonta, Jonathan Selvanathan, Jay Patel, Kieran Wilson, Harvin Kaura, Cody Berry, Mohsen Tayefeh, Ahmad Barari

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicExperimental Learning in Engineering
Canadian institutionsOntario Tech University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceAutomationInternet of ThingsThe InternetPower consumptionArchitecturePower (physics)Artificial intelligenceComputer securityDistributed computingEmbedded systemWorld Wide WebEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Internet of Things (IoT) has allowed devices to connect to external services and utilize outside information to create knowledge about their tasks and decide more intelligently regarding their processes. This paper presents an architecture to develop a novel autonomous snowblower concept that uses IoT to intelligently determine the best times to clear a driveway. By examining weather data for the area of operation, the snowblower will combine computer vision and Visual Simultaneous Localization and Mapping (VSLAM) to effectively clear an area of snow before accumulation becomes too much for the electric motors to handle. This combination of IoT and conventional automation allows for a tradeoff between intelligence and power. The developed framework shows the benefits of IoT on a device like this, and how a lower power device, used intelligently, can be an effective solution for a larger problem.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicExperimental Learning in EngineeringFrench-language works237,207