MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3199503502 · doi:10.14444/8122

Efficacy of Anterior Vertebral Body Tethering in Skeletally Mature Children with Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: A Preliminary Report

2021· article· en· W3199503502 on OpenAlex
Sajan Hegde, Muralidharan Venkatesan, Keyur Akbari, Vigneshwara Badikillaya

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe International Journal of Spine Surgery · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicScoliosis diagnosis and treatment
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersYork University
KeywordsMedicineCobb angleRadiographyScoliosisSagittal planeIdiopathic scoliosisOrthodonticsLumbarSurgeryRadiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

<h3>ABSTRACT</h3> <h3>Background:</h3> Anterior vertebral body tethering (AVBT) offers a dynamic fusionless correction option for children with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). Few existing clinical studies evaluating novel AVBT in skeletally immature children have questioned the midterm efficacy with concerns of overcorrection and curve progression with remaining growth. The current study investigates the effect of this technique in skeletally mature children (Risser ≥ 4 and Sanders ≥ 7) with AIS with limited remaining growth potential. <h3>Methods:</h3> We evaluated skeletally mature children with AIS who underwent the AVBT technique for a single structural major curve between 40° and 80° with ≥50% flexibility on dynamic radiographs and a minimum of 1 year of follow-up. Pertinent clinical and radiographic data collected include skeletal maturity, curve type, Cobb angle, sagittal parameters, and a patient-reported outcome measure Scoliosis Research Society-22 (SRS-22) questionnaire. <h3>Results:</h3> All 10 children were female with a mean age of 14.9 ± 2.7 years at the time of surgery. The mean follow-up was 24.1 ± 3.6 months. The mean Risser and Sanders scores were 4.2 ± 0.6 and 7.2 ± 0.6, respectively. Three patients had major thoracic curves, and 7 patients had thoracolumbar/lumbar curves. Cranial and caudal instrumented levels were T5 and L4. Mean preoperative Cobb9s angle was 52.0° ± 11.6° and was corrected to 15.9° ± 6.8° on the first erect postoperative radiograph, with stabilization of corrected curve at the 1-year follow-up (mean Cobb9s angle of 15.3° ± 8.7°). Mean preoperative and postoperative SRS-22 scores were 78.0 ± 3.2 and 92.5 ± 3.1, respectively (<i>P</i> &lt; .01). No complications were noted until the last follow-up. <h3>Conclusion:</h3> Our preliminary experience with this novel AVBT as an alternative technique to fusion to stabilize progressive idiopathic scoliosis in skeletally mature children is promising. <h3>Level of Evidence:</h3> 4.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.021
Threshold uncertainty score0.369

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.277
Teacher spread0.263 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it