MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3199523049 · doi:10.31743/zn.2018.61.2.29-47

Biedaczyna krakowski – obraz Alberta Chmielowskiego w czasopismach zakładu albertynów

2020· article· pl· W3199523049 on OpenAlex
Jolanta Klimek-Grądzka

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueZeszyty Naukowe Katolickiego Uniwersytetu Lubelskiego Jana Pawła II · 2020
Typearticle
Languagepl
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicLanguage and Culture
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsTheologyPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Na podstawie tekstów prozatorskich i poetyckich zamieszczonych w dwóch czasopismach wydawanych w latach 1932-1939 przez krakowski zakład wychowawczy albertynów poddano analizie przedstawiany w nich językowy obraz Adama Chmielowskiego – br. Alberta. Stwierdzono prymat profili związanych z jego życiem duchowym i działalnością zakonną: święty, zakonnik, założyciel zgromadzenia, mistrz i nauczyciel, opiekun ubogich. Na uboczu pozostają profile artysta i przyjaciel. Tworząca wymienione profile siatka leksykalna i dopełniające ją wartościujące pozytywnie określenia składają się na spójny obraz br. Alberta uznawanego za świętego jeszcze przed oficjalnym wyniesieniem go na ołtarze.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Open science, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.793
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.003
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0040.002
Bibliometrics0.0010.008
Science and technology studies0.0060.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0060.003
Research integrity0.0030.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0160.008

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it