MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3199549300 · doi:10.1109/tpami.2021.3115139

Learning Frequency Domain Priors for Image Demoireing

2021· article· en· W3199549300 on OpenAlexaff
Bolun Zheng, Shanxin Yuan, Chenggang Yan, Xiang Tian, Jiyong Zhang, Yaoqi Sun, Lin Liu, Aleš Leonardis, Greg Slabaugh

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicImage Enhancement Techniques
Canadian institutionsHuawei Technologies (Canada)
FundersNational Key Research and Development Program of ChinaHigher Education Discipline Innovation ProjectNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsArtificial intelligenceComputer scienceDiscrete cosine transformFrequency domainBlock (permutation group theory)Convolution (computer science)Convolutional neural networkComputer visionMargin (machine learning)Pattern recognition (psychology)Image restorationImage (mathematics)Prior probabilityImage processingMathematicsArtificial neural network

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Image demoireing is a multi-faceted image restoration task involving both moire pattern removal and color restoration. In this paper, we raise a general degradation model to describe an image contaminated by moire patterns, and propose a novel multi-scale bandpass convolutional neural network (MBCNN) for single image demoireing. For moire pattern removal, we propose a multi-block-size learnable bandpass filters (M-LBFs), based on a block-wise frequency domain transform, to learn the frequency domain priors of moire patterns. We also introduce a new loss function named Dilated Advanced Sobel loss (D-ASL) to better sense the frequency information. For color restoration, we propose a two-step tone mapping strategy, which first applies a global tone mapping to correct for a global color shift, and then performs local fine tuning of the color per pixel. To determine the most appropriate frequency domain transform, we investigate several transforms including DCT, DFT, DWT, learnable non-linear transform and learnable orthogonal transform. We finally adopt the DCT. Our basic model won the AIM2019 demoireing challenge. Experimental results on three public datasets show that our method outperforms state-of-the-art methods by a large margin.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.274
Teacher spread0.261 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations73
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine IntelligenceSame topicImage Enhancement TechniquesFrench-language works237,207