MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3199549508 · doi:10.17762/de.vi.4215

Ensemble Learning based Age Invariant Fea-ture Recognition Using Soft Computing

2021· article· en· W3199549508 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Dr J. P. Pandey Divyanshu Sinha

Bibliographic record

VenueDesign Engineering · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicFace recognition and analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSupport vector machineArtificial intelligenceComputer scienceConvolutional neural networkFacial recognition systemMachine learningPattern recognition (psychology)Invariant (physics)Artificial neural networkKernel (algebra)Face (sociological concept)Mathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Face recognition system is a state-of-the-art computer vision application within the artificial intelligence arena. Face recognition is the automated recognition of humans for their names/unique ID. The age invariant face recognition is a challenge task in the field of face recog-nition. In this work, we have introduced a stacked support vector machine where kernel activation of prototype examples is combined in nonlinear ways. The proposed work integrates soft compu-ting-based support vector machine (SVM) with deep SVM. The proposed model uses the implied relation between the variables described above in order to optimize their overall performance. Specifically, our method uses three different stages of complex convolution neural networks that detect and analyze the location of faces position and landmarks. This work has introduced cross-age celebrity dataset (CACD) for both single as well as cross-database enabling the transition of age. The proposed work has been implemented in the MATLAB simulation tool considering CACD dataset. Experimental results indicate that our techniques significantly outperform other strategies across a range of challenging metrics.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.181 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDesign EngineeringSame topicFace recognition and analysisFrench-language works237,207