MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3199572872 · doi:10.2118/206730-pa

Determination of Horizontal In-Situ Stress Profiles and Rock Deformation Moduli in Karamay Basin Using a Multiobjective Optimization Technique

2021· article· en· W3199572872 on OpenAlexaff
Hongxue Han, Maurice B. Dusseault, Shunde Yin, Guowei Xia, Mingchao Peng

Bibliographic record

VenueSPE Journal · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHydraulic Fracturing and Reservoir Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBoreholeGeologyCalipersInversion (geology)Deformation (meteorology)Stress fieldStress (linguistics)Rock mechanicsStructural basinGeotechnical engineeringGeometryEngineeringGeomorphologyMathematicsStructural engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Summary We introduce a quick and cost-effective method of estimating horizontal in-situ stress profiles and rock elastic moduli vs. depth from geophysical logs taken in vertical well sections. A multiobjective optimization approach finds the optimum solution for the inversion of in-situ stresses and the rock mechanical parameters from elastic borehole deformations measured by the commonly available four-arm caliper tools. The four-arm caliper log responses also permit quality control (QC) of input and identification and classification of borehole sections that display breakouts and sloughing. The method is applied in the estimation of horizontal in-situ stress profiles and rock deformation moduli vs. depth in Karamay Basin, Northwestern China. The results have demonstrated good agreement with available field in-situ stress measurements, indicating promising broader applications of the method.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.432
Threshold uncertainty score0.286

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSPE JournalSame topicHydraulic Fracturing and Reservoir AnalysisFrench-language works237,207