Jurisprudence récente en droit de la franchise
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Dans cet article, les auteurs analysent cinq arrets qui, au cours des annees 2019-2020, ont marque le franchisage non seulement au Quebec, mais egalement dans le reste du Canada. Les sujets abordes sont varies, mais ils ont tous le franchisage comme denominateur commun. Les auteurs examinent ainsi une decision qui touche aux devoirs d’assistance du franchiseur a l’endroit de ses franchises et une autre qui se rapporte au lien de droit qui peut exister ou non entre les franchises d’un reseau et le fournisseur designe par le franchiseur. Les auteurs commentent aussi une decision de la Cour federale concernant l’octroi d’une licence implicite d’utilisation d’une marque de commerce. Enfin, les auteurs se penchent sur une decision relative au devoir d’information du franchiseur a l’endroit d’un candidat franchise et sur une decision de la plus haute instance au pays qui traite de la nature d’un contrat de franchise a la lumiere des lois. regissant le droit du travail.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.011 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.012 | 0.019 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.011 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.005 | 0.007 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".