MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3199609021 · doi:10.32920/ryerson.14652879.v1

DirectAR: Teaching the basics of Cinematography Using Augmented Reality as Learning Tool

2021· preprint· en· W3199609021 on OpenAlexaff
Gonzalo Andres Bastidas Arteaga

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAugmented Reality Applications
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAugmented realityGRASPComputer scienceCinematographyValue (mathematics)Human–computer interactionOrder (exchange)MultimediaVisual artsArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper examines the development of an augmented reality app that will be used as a tool for people interested in learning the conventions of cinematography. Augmented reality has demonstrated its value in various aspects of education, from helping highschoolers learn abstract concepts of chemistry, to medical and nursing training. DirectAR merges augmented reality with tried and tested visual language concepts in order to give its users a hands-on learning experience. This is possible due to the creation of AR characters that serve as models with which users of this app are able to grasp concepts by actually putting them into practice

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.877
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.004
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.312
Teacher spread0.279 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAugmented Reality ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207