MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3199625396 · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-21684/v1

Patient satisfaction with malaria care among pregnant women and mothers of under 5 children in Ibadan, Southwest Nigeria

2020· preprint· en· W3199625396 on OpenAlexaff
Kelechi Elizabeth Oladimeji, Joyce Mahlako Tsoka-Gwegweni, Sanni Yaya, Jerry John Nutor, Abiodun M. Adeola, Samuel Nambile Cumber, Francis Leonard Mpotte Hyera, Ter Daniel Goon

Bibliographic record

VenueResearch Square (Research Square) · 2020
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGlobal Maternal and Child Health
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMalariaMedicineFamily medicineObstetricsEnvironmental health

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Patient satisfaction is as an important measure of program assessment and health system performance. In our study, we assessed patient’s satisfaction with malaria care among pregnant women (PW) and mothers of children less than five years of age (MU5) in Ibadan, Nigeria. Methods A cross-sectional design, patient satisfaction with malaria care was assessed among 1,373 participants (818 PW and 555 MU5) with the anti-malarial care they received in a comprehensive hospital in Ibadan, Nigeria. Data on patient satisfaction was obtained using a validated eighteen-item questionnaire (PSQ-18) and analyzed using the standard satisfaction scales and quantitative scores. Results Overall, more than half of the participants (79.5% of PW and 78.8% MU5) were well satisfied with malaria care. The least satisfaction i.e., 41.4% among PW (mean satisfaction score = 3.06±1.2) and 45.1% (mean 3.16±1.3) among MU5 was reported on the clinical technical quality of (Sometimes doctors make me wonder if their diagnosis is correct). Furthermore, general satisfaction (based on satisfactions with technical quality, inter-personal attitude, communication, cost, accessibility or convenience and time spent with the doctor) was inversely associated with parity of PW (OR for PW with one child = 0.51, 95% CI: 0.34-0.75 with reference to pregnant women who have had more than one child) in multivariate analyses. Among MU5, general satisfaction was associated with extreme poverty (OR = for the poorest = 0.30, 95% CI: 0.10-0.90, with reference to the richest). Conclusion Socio economic status plays significant roles in mothers’ satisfaction with health care access, level of care received and most importantly their prospective health seeking behaviour. Important aspect, such as patient’s perception of being well treated by the health care provider should be a key consideration for formulate a patients’ centred strategy to improve malaria cares in Oyo state and Nigeria at large.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.033
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0010.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.352
Teacher spread0.318 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueResearch Square (Research Square)Same topicGlobal Maternal and Child HealthFrench-language works237,207