MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3199756882 · doi:10.1021/acsomega.1c03798

Designing Multifunctional Co and Fe Co-Doped MoS<sub>2</sub> Nanocube Electrodes for Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells, Perovskite Solar Cells, and a Supercapacitor

2021· article· en· W3199756882 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Chang Xu, Wenlu Yang, Jiaxin Zhao, Jingyuan Ma, Mingxing Wu

Bibliographic record

VenueACS Omega · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicSupercapacitor Materials and Fabrication
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersInstitute of AgingNatural Science Foundation of Hebei Province
KeywordsSupercapacitorMaterials scienceElectrodeDye-sensitized solar cellPerovskite (structure)CobaltAuxiliary electrodeEnergy conversion efficiencyRedoxChemical engineeringCapacitanceDopingNanotechnologyAnalytical Chemistry (journal)OptoelectronicsChemistryMetallurgyPhysical chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

High Resolution Image Download MS PowerPoint Slide In the present study, three types of specific solid, core–shell, and hollow structured cobalt and iron co-doped MoS 2 nanocubes (denoted as s-Co-Fe-MoS x, c-Co-Fe-MoS x, and h-Co-Fe-MoS x ) are controllably synthesized for the first time by regulating the reactant mass ratios. The prepared Co-Fe-MoS x nanocubes can function as a counter electrode in dye-sensitized and perovskite solar cells (DSCs and PSCs) and a working electrode in a supercapacitor. In the DSC system, the c-Co-Fe-MoS x nanocubes exhibit the maximum catalytic activity to the Co 3+/2+ redox couple regeneration, and the device achieves a power conversion efficiency (PCE) of 8.69%, significantly higher than the devices using s-Co-Fe-MoS x (6.61%) and h-Co-Fe-MoS x (7.63%) counter electrodes. Similarly, all of the prepared Co-Fe-MoS x nanocubes show decent activity in PSCs and the device using the c-Co-Fe-MoS x counter electrode achieves the highest PCE of 6.88%. It is worth noting that, as the supercapacitor working electrode, the h-Co-Fe-MoS x exhibits a specific capacitance of 85.4 F g –1, significantly higher than the parallel values achieved by the s-Co-Fe-MoS x and c-Co-Fe-MoS x electrodes under identical conditions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.228
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations35
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueACS OmegaSame topicSupercapacitor Materials and FabricationFrench-language works237,207