MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3199764101 · doi:10.1002/ccr3.4811

Safe use of a once‐a‐week glucagon‐like peptide‐1 receptor agonist in a 16‐year‐old girl with type 2 diabetes when approved therapy options fail

2021· article· en· W3199764101 on OpenAlexaff
Louisa van den Boom, Theresa Stuecher, Julia K. Mader

Bibliographic record

VenueClinical Case Reports · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDiabetes Treatment and Management
Canadian institutionsKirkland and District Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineDulaglutideGlycemicType 2 diabetesGlucagon-like peptide 1 receptorGirlAgonistIntensive care medicineGlucagon-like peptide-1PediatricsInternal medicineDiabetes mellitusEndocrinologyExenatideInsulinReceptor

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This case report demonstrates that using a non-approved long-acting GLP-1-RA (dulaglutide) in adolescents with T2D is possible and feasible under special circumstances when approved therapeutic options for the pediatric population fail to achieve adequate glycemic control.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.818
Threshold uncertainty score0.790

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.082
GPT teacher head0.328
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueClinical Case ReportsSame topicDiabetes Treatment and ManagementFrench-language works237,207