MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3199764285 · doi:10.1109/tap.2021.3111665

Ray-Optical Evaluation of Scattering from Electrically Large Metasurfaces Characterized by Locally Periodic Surface Susceptibilities

2021· article· en· W3199764285 on OpenAlexaff
Scott A. Stewart, Y.L.C. de Jong, T. Smy, Shulabh Gupta

Bibliographic record

VenuearXiv (Cornell University) · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicMetamaterials and Metasurfaces Applications
Canadian institutionsCommunications Research Centre CanadaCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsScatteringOpticsPhysicsSurface (topology)Ray tracing (physics)Reflection (computer programming)Field (mathematics)Periodic boundary conditionsMathematical analysisBoundary value problemMathematicsGeometryComputer scienceQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This work continues the development of the raytracing method of [1] for computing the scattered fields from metasurfaces characterized by locally periodic reflection and transmission coefficients. In this work, instead of describing the metasurface in terms of scattering coefficients that depend on the incidence direction, its scattering behavior is characterized by the surface susceptibility tensors that appear in the generalized sheet transition conditions (GSTCs). As the latter quantities are constitutive parameters, they do not depend on the incident field and thus enable a more compact and physically motivated description of the surface. The locally periodic susceptibility profile is expanded into a Fourier series, and the GSTCs are rewritten in a form that enables them to be numerically solved for in terms of the reflected and transmitted surface fields. The scattered field at arbitrary detector locations is constructed by evaluating critical-point contributions of the first and second kinds using a Forward Ray Tracing (FRT) scheme. The accuracy of the resulting framework has been verified with an Integral Equation based Boundary Element Method (BEM)-GSTC full-wave solver for a variety of examples such as a periodically modulated metasurface, a metasurface diffuser and a beam collimator.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.017
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.061
GPT teacher head0.213
Teacher spread0.152 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations26
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuearXiv (Cornell University)Same topicMetamaterials and Metasurfaces ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207