Bibliographic record
Abstract
The article is devoted to the study of social dance as a phenomenon of modern dance practice. It is emphasized that in modern culture there is an increase in interest in social dance, which necessitates a theoretical understanding of this phenomenon in particular and dance culture in general from the standpoint of modern science, because at the moment its level does not correspond to the degree of practical interest in social dance. It is stated that for most world civilizations, dance in general and social dance in particular, is one of the most important expressions of their worldview, which represents both historical and contemporary cultural values. And forms of movement illuminate and define gender, shape personal and group identity, and reflect and define political and religious status and aesthetic values. Thanks to advances in the media, social dance is now one of the most popular pastimes in the world, combining dance forms of past centuries with new ones, such as hip-hop and contact improvisations. The study found that the phenomenon of social dance in the context of dance practice in the XXI century. is an organic combination of elements of various areas of dance culture with the culture of modern society, as well as the promotion of philosophical and ideological paradigm of freedom of movement and communication in dance.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.015 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".