MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3199806097 · doi:10.3389/ijph.2021.1604465

WHO Air Quality Guidelines 2021–Aiming for Healthier Air for all: A Joint Statement by Medical, Public Health, Scientific Societies and Patient Representative Organisations

2021· editorial· en· W3199806097 on OpenAlexaff
Barbara Hoffmann, Hanna Boogaard, Audrey de Nazelle, Zorana Jovanovic Andersen, Michael J. Abramson, Michael Bräuer, Bert Brunekreef, Francesco Forastiere, Wei Huang, Haidong Kan, Joel D. Kaufman, Klea Katsouyanni, Michał Krzyżanowski, Nino Küenzli, Francine Laden, Mark Nieuwenhuijsen, Adetoun Mustapha, Pippa Powell, Mary B. Rice, Aina Roca-Barceló, Charlotte Roscoe, Kurt Straíf, George D. Thurston

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Public Health · 2021
Typeeditorial
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAir Quality and Health Impacts
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersNational Institute of Environmental Health SciencesMedical Research Council
KeywordsPublic healthStatement (logic)Environmental healthJournal of Public HealthMedicinePolitical sciencePublic relationsPublic health policyHealth policyNursingLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

COMMENTARY Int J Public Health, 23 September 2021 https://doi.org/10.3389/ijph.2021.1604465

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.030
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.024
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Meta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesMetaresearch
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.409
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0300.024
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.224
GPT teacher head0.483
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations214
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Public HealthSame topicAir Quality and Health ImpactsFrench-language works237,207